Comparative study evaluates properties of soluble dietary fibers as glass formers in food powders, indicating their potential for stability enhancement.
The rising demand for functional low-calorie ingredients with improved powder stability has increased interest in soluble dietary fibers (SDFs) as alternatives to conventional maltodextrins. These fibers differ in molecular structure and water interaction, influencing their ability to form stable amorphous matrices during spray drying. However, direct comparative evaluations of their intrinsic physicochemical and thermal properties remain limited. This study compared commercial Orafti® inulin (inulin), TIC PRETESTED® GUM ARABIC FT POWDER (gum arabic), Nutriose®FB 06 (nutriose), and STA-LITE®III Polydextrose (polydextrose) to elucidate their structure – function relationships as standalone glass formers. Each fiber was characterized for moisture content, water activity, solubility, hygroscopicity, morphology (field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), particle size distribution (PSD), universal attenuated total reflectance-fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (UATR-FTIR), X-ray Diffraction (X-RD), water sorption isotherm [Formula: see text], and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). All fibers exhibited very high solubility [Formula: see text], with inulin achieving [Formula: see text]. Gum arabic showed the highest moisture content [Formula: see text] but the lowest water activity [Formula: see text] while polydextrose recorded the highest [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] Hygroscopicity ranged from [Formula: see text](inulin) to [Formula: see text] (gum arabic). The Guggenheim – Anderson – de Boer (GAB) model accurately described sorption data [Formula: see text], revealing differences in monolayer moisture [Formula: see text] and multilayer adsorption. Gum arabic and nutriose exhibited higher glass transition temperatures [Formula: see text], indicating greater resistance to plasticization, whereas inulin showed lowest [Formula: see text] due to its semi-crystalline structure. Overall, synthetic resistant dextrins (gum arabic and nutriose) provided the most balanced performance in solubility, hygroscopic stability, and thermal resistance, supporting their potential use as sustainable glass formers in spray-dried food systems with extended shelf life
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parlan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: