Key result
Rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin linked to ~7% higher new-onset diabetes risk versus atorvastatin.
Why the study?
Does the choice of individual statin affect the risk of new-onset diabetes in patients with established ASCVD?
Cohort (n=29,826)
Does the choice of individual statin affect the risk of new-onset diabetes in patients with established ASCVD?
Hazard Ratio: 1.07 (95% CI 1.01–1.14)
The risk of new-onset diabetes varies among individual statins in secondary prevention, suggesting a need for individualized selection to balance metabolic and cardiovascular risks.
Introduction Statins are the cornerstone of secondary prevention in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but their association with new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) remains incompletely defined. Whether the risk of NODM differs among individual statins within the same intensity class has not been well established. Methods Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database, we identified 29,826 patients with established ASCVD who initiated statin therapy between 2009 and 2012 and were followed for up to five years. The primary endpoint was incident NODM, defined by new diagnostic coding plus antidiabetic medication use after a three-year window period. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results Overall, 11,918 patients (40.0%) developed NODM. The incidence of NODM was comparable between high- and moderate-intensity statins (42.9% vs. 41.1%). In the moderate-intensity group, rosuvastatin (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.14), pravastatin (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02–1.38), and simvastatin (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06–1.20) were associated with higher NODM risk compared with atorvastatin, while fluvastatin and pitavastatin showed no significant differences. MACCE incidence was similar across statins. Discussion In this nationwide secondary prevention cohort, the risk of NODM differed across individual statins despite comparable cardiovascular outcomes. These findings suggest that the diabetogenic effect of statins may be agent-specific rather than a uniform class effect, highlighting the importance of individualized statin selection balancing metabolic and cardiovascular benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=29,826). Moderate-intensity statins (rosuvastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin) vs. Atorvastatin was evaluated on Incident new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14). Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin were associated with higher risk of new-onset diabetes compared with atorvastatin (rosuvastatin HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: