Key result
High-intensity atorvastatin shows no difference in NODM or MACE compared with rosuvastatin after AMI.
Why the study?
There have been consistent concerns regarding the association of high-intensity statin therapy with new-onset diabetes mellitus in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Does high-intensity atorvastatin compared to rosuvastatin affect the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus and MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction without diabetes?
Cohort (n=2,221)
Yes
Does high-intensity atorvastatin compared to rosuvastatin affect the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus and MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction without diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.098 (95% CI 0.808–1.491)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.5% vs 9.2%
p-value: p=0.551
High-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin demonstrate clinical equivalence regarding new-onset diabetes and cardiovascular outcomes for secondary prevention in AMI patients.
High-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin yield comparable NODM and MACE rates post-AMI; supports clinical equivalence but leaves open need for randomized trials.
Background: High-intensity statin therapy is typically used in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for secondary prevention. However, there have been consistent concerns regarding its association with diabetes mellitus. We investigated the effect of high-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) and cardiovascular outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period. Methods: Data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry were collected from November 2011 to October 2015, and 13,104 patients with AMI were enrolled from major cardiovascular centers. Among them, 2,221 patients without diabetes who had been administered with high-intensity atorvastatin (40–80 mg) and rosuvastatin (20 mg) were investigated. The atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups were evaluated for the incidence of NODM and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization cases in the following 3 years. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Event-free survival rate of NODM and MACE was not significantly different between the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups (92.5% vs. 90.8%, respectively; Log-rank P-value = 0.550). The event-free survival rate of MACE was also not significantly different between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups (89.0% vs. 89.6%, respectively; Log rank P-value = 0.662). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that statin type was not a prognostic factor in the development of NODM and MACE. Conclusions: Administering high-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in patients with AMI produced comparable effects on NODM and clinical outcomes, suggesting their clinical equivalence in secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=2,221). High-intensity atorvastatin (40-80 mg) vs. High-intensity rosuvastatin (20 mg) was evaluated on Incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) (HR 1.098, 95% CI 0.808-1.491, p=0.551). High-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin therapies showed no significant difference in the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (HR 1.098) or major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: