Key result
Coronary venous ethanol ablation achieves acute success in ~69% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Coronary vein ethanol ablation is increasingly used to treat ventricular arrhythmias, but the features of arrhythmias successfully eliminated by this technique required characterization.
Does coronary venous ethanol ablation (CVEA) safely and effectively eliminate ventricular arrhythmias in patients without structural heart disease, and what are the associated ECG characteristics?
Cohort (n=42)
Yes
Does coronary venous ethanol ablation (CVEA) safely and effectively eliminate ventricular arrhythmias in patients without structural heart disease, and what are the associated ECG characteristics?
Coronary venous ethanol ablation is a feasible treatment for ventricular arrhythmias, with specific target veins (S1, LVA, AIV) exhibiting distinct ECG morphologies that can guide procedural planning.
Background Coronary vein ethanol ablation(CVEA) is increasingly used for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).Objective To characterize the features of VAs eliminated by CVEA. MethodsConsecutive patients underwent CVEA were prospectively enrolled and classified as acute success or failure groups.Targeted veins were categorized as the first septal vein(S1), left ventricular annular vein(LVA), or anterior interventricular vein(AIV).Results Forty-two patients (mean age 52.5 14.3 years, 42.9% female) underwent CEVA, 29 (69.0%)achieved acute success.Ethanol was delivered via S1 in 16 patients, LVA in 8, and AIV in 5.In success cases, S1 and LVA-eliminated VAs exhibited similar right bundle branch block-like morphologies, whereas AIV-related VAs showed a left bundle branch block pattern with QS in leads V1-V2 and late precordial Rwave transition.During ethanol infusion, a transient "irritative" response in VA burden occurred in 44.8% of patients and was more frequently observed in successful cases.Complications were limited to transient bundle branch block in 4/42 (9.5%) and transient ST-T changes in 1/42 (2.4%), which resolved spontaneously after pausing/terminating ethanol infusion as needed.During follow-up, 4 patients experienced VA recurrences.One underwent repeat CVEA at the same target vein, and 3 were successfully managed with drug therapy.Conclusions Successful CVEA from S1 and LVA yield similar ECG morphologies, whereas AIV-related VAs were characterized by QS in V1-V2 with late precordial transition.An irritative response during ethanol infusion may indicate effective ablation, and ethanol delivery from S1 or LVA may induce transient bundle branch block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ventricular arrhythmias (n=42). Coronary venous ethanol ablation (CVEA) vs. null was evaluated on acute success defined as the elimination of spontaneous clinical PVC after ethanol infusion. Coronary venous ethanol ablation achieved acute success in 69.0% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: