Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mobile and Open-Source Applications for Facial Growth Assessment: A Retrospective Observational Study

Facial growth and development are influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and predicting these changes is valuable in forensic science and clinical dentistry. While age-progression tools powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), such as mobile applications, Remini AI, and open-source software, Style-Based Age Manipulation (SAM), offer innovative solutions, their clinical applicability remains underexplored. To evaluate the accuracy and clinical feasibility of AI-driven age progression tools, using a mobile application and an open-source software. This retrospective observational study used the Face and Gesture Recognition Network (FG-NET) aging database and personal photographs. Each tool processed 18 original photographs, generating 180 age-progressed outputs for target ages of 5, 11, 15, 18, and 26 years. Subjective assessments by dental experts included reordering, categorization, and accuracy tasks. Objective assessments used an age estimation model Multi Input VOLO (MiVolo), to estimate the age portrayed by the AI-generated images. Statistical analyses included t-tests and chi-square tests with a significance level of 5%. Remini AI achieved higher categorization accuracy (55%, P < .001), whereas SAM generated more realistic age progressions between 11 and 18 years old, with a lower mean absolute error (2.7 years vs. 3.7 years, P < .001). Neither tool performed effectively for the youngest (age 5) or oldest (age 26) groups. SAM generated images significantly faster than Remini AI, averaging 9 seconds versus 5 minutes per image (P < .001). Remini AI excels in categorization, while SAM demonstrates greater accuracy and efficiency for mid-childhood and young adulthood. Both require refinement for younger and older populations, highlighting AI’s potential in forensic investigations and clinical dentistry. • Remini AI excels in the age categorization tasks, but its accuracy based on age estimation is limited. • SAM generates accurate realistic age progressions for mid-childhood and young adulthood. • Neither SAM or Remini AI generated accurate predictive images in younger children.