High-flow versus standard nasal cannula oxygenation for post-procedural quality of recovery in older adults undergoing sedated ERCP: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

March 11, 2026Annals of MedicineOpen Access

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to compare the effects of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation and standard nasal cannula oxygenation on recovery quality in older adults after sedation.
Randomized controlled trial design.
Participants are older adults undergoing sedated ERCP.
Intervention groups receive either high-flow or standard nasal cannula oxygenation.
Assessment of recovery quality post-procedure.
Expected to determine differences in recovery quality between the two oxygenation methods.
No specific quantitative results provided yet due to study design.

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Randomized controlled trial compares recovery quality in older adults after sedated ERCP, suggesting oxygenation method may impact outcomes.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: ChiCTR2500105743).

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share