Pilot study finds CAD-based body scans produce reliable measurements in smart clothing, indicating posture effects.
This pilot study evaluates the reliability and systematic bias of CAD-based 3D body-scan anthropometry (3DM) for electrode-referenced measurements in smart clothing applications. Anthropometric data from 24 male participants were obtained using both manual measurement (MM) and CAD-based analysis of 3D scan data across five dimensions relevant to EMG-enabled garments. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and agreement was examined through Bland–Altman analysis. The results demonstrated excellent reliability for all measurements (ICC > 0.9), indicating strong consistency between MM and 3DM. However, systematic biases were observed: 3DM underestimated biacromion length, primarily due to standardized scanning posture, and overestimated waist circumference, reflecting the absence of soft-tissue compression in non-contact scanning. In contrast, short surface paths between anatomical landmarks and electrode sites exhibited minimal bias and high agreement. These findings suggest that while CAD-based 3D scan anthropometry provides stable and reproducible electrode-referenced measurements, certain dimensions require careful interpretation due to posture- and curvature-related effects. This methodological evaluation establishes a foundation for the informed use of 3D scan–derived anthropometric data in future smart clothing and wearable system development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: