Abstract Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related death in the adolescent and young adult (AYA; ages 15 – 39) population. CNS tumors in AYAs are biologically and clinically distinct as they intersect those seen in younger children and older adults, and there is a lack of standardized treatment approaches for such patients. To improve clinical management of this patient population in Canada, virtual AYA CNS tumor boards were established in which a multidisciplinary team of pediatric and adult physicians review challenging cases and make evidence-based suggestions regarding optimal care. From November 2021 to June 2024, 185 AYA CNS tumor patients were presented at biweekly tumor board rounds. Patient medical history and tumor board recommendation information was de-identified, stored in a REDCap database and subsequently analyzed. Concurrent weekly molecular rounds at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) performed genetic and epigenetic analysis of AYA CNS tumors. Most patients presented (n = 138) had a glioma diagnosis, with pediatric diffuse low-grade glioma being the commonest subtype (n = 59). Recommendations made by the AYA CNS tumor board often represented a change in clinical management from the patient’s previous treatment course. A large subset of glioma patients were directed toward clinical trials and targeted agents and were spared further exposure to radiation therapy. Concurrent molecular profiling of 157 AYA gliomas identified targetable genetic alterations including BRAF fusions and FGFR1 fusions and mutations. Feedback from meeting attendees indicated that attending AYA CNS tumor board rounds was a valuable experience. Our work represents an effort to standardize and improve care for AYA CNS tumor patients in Canada through recurring, biweekly interdisciplinary tumor boards. Our results suggest that AYA CNS tumor board recommendations are effective in guiding patients towards clinical trials and targeted agents, and are a valued resource by Canadian clinicians.
Dave et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: