This research demonstrates enhanced biomass production and nutritional quality in waterleaf under varying temperature regimes, indicating adaptive strategies for climate resilience.
This study investigated the morphophysiological and biochemical responses of waterleaf ( Talinum triangulare Jacq.) to different temperature regimes (18°C, 22°C, 25°C, and 35°C) to assess its potential as a climate‐resilient crop. Through controlled‐environment experiments, we demonstrated that temperature significantly ( p < 0.05) influenced all measured morphophysiological and biochemical parameters. Plants grown at 35°C showed maximal biomass production (57.80 g fresh weight; 2.4‐fold higher than at 25°C) but exhibited oxidative stress (8.7 nmol/g MDA) and altered metabolite profiles. The 25°C regime optimized the balance between yield and nutritional quality, maintaining high photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm = 0.80) while accumulating beneficial phytochemicals (15.2 mg GAE/g phenolics). Cooler temperatures (18°C) severely limited growth (4.55 g fresh weight) despite some metabolic advantages of high accumulation of antioxidant compounds. Principal component analysis distinguished treatment responses along two primary axes: PC1 (68.83% variance) separated 35°C‐grown plants, characterized by vigorous growth (2.4‐fold greater biomass than 25°C), from 18°C plants showing metabolic suppression ( p < 0.05). PC2 (22.97% variance) revealed a secondary gradient of photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm = 0.81 at 35°C vs. 0.74 at 18°C) and oxidative stress (MDA levels 2.7 vs. 2.4 nmol/g FW), with 25°C plants exhibiting optimal balance between these parameters. These findings establish that waterleaf employs distinct adaptation strategies across temperature regimes, with 25°C representing the optimal compromise between productivity and nutritional value. The study provides critical data for cultivating waterleaf as a sustainable crop under climate change, recommending temperature‐specific management strategies tailored to either biomass production (35°C) or nutrient‐dense leaf production (25°C).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nutsukpo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: