Crystallographic and electronic structure study reveals mixed-valence states in 1D rhodium-dioxolene complexes, indicating their unique electronic properties.
We report a crystallographic and electronic-structure study on three rhodium–dioxolene complexes that illustrate how crystallographic degrees of freedom control static and dynamic mixed-valence states in one-dimensional(1D)assemblies. Complexes{[Rh(3,6-DBDiox-4,5-S2CO)(CO)2]4・hexane}∞(4) and [Rh(3,6-DBDiox-4,5-S2CO)(CO)2]4(5)share essentially the same tetrameric Rh4 core but form, respectively, a 1D chain of tetramers stabilized by solvent inclusion and a discrete tetramer crystal. XPS and metrical oxidation state (MOS) analysis reveal Rh (I,II) mixed-valence states with an integer charge transfer of one electron per tetramer. In contrast, [Rh(3,6-DBDiox-4-NO2)(CO)2]∞(6)forms an equidistant 1D Rh chain and exhibits a first-order phase transition accompanied by a small fractional electron transfer per Rh and a large-amplitude Rh–Rh vibration. DFT and TD-DFT calculations show strong dσ*(Rh)–π*(SQ) mixing, accounting for the broad NIR–mid-IR bands and 1D conduction. By comparing tetramer-based and chain-based systems, we establish a unified picture of static versus dynamic mixed-valence states in dimension-controlled rhodium–dioxolene assemblies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minoru Mitsumi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: