Key result
Prolonged length of stay after esophagectomy is linked to a ~213% increase in 5-year mortality odds.
Why the study?
Postoperative length of stay after esophagectomy varies substantially, but whether prolonged length of stay is associated with long-term oncologic outcomes remains unclear.
Does prolonged length of stay affect long-term survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy?
Cohort (n=84)
No
Does prolonged length of stay affect long-term survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy?
Prolonged length of stay after esophagectomy serves as a surrogate marker for perioperative vulnerability and is independently associated with worse long-term overall and disease-free survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prompts closer long-term monitoring after prolonged LOS post-esophagectomy; extends evidence linking perioperative vulnerability to oncologic outcomes.
Postoperative length of stay (LOS) after esophagectomy varies substantially and is influenced by multiple perioperative factors. Whether prolonged LOS is associated with long-term oncologic outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective single-center cohort study included 84 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2017 and 2018. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define prolonged LOS. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression models were constructed with a limited set of clinically relevant covariates to evaluate the association between prolonged LOS and long-term outcomes. An LOS of ≥ 17 days was identified as the optimal cutoff to define prolonged LOS. Patients with prolonged LOS experienced significantly higher postoperative complication rates and worse 5-year OS and DFS compared with those with normal LOS. After adjustment for age, ASA classification, pathological stage, and postoperative complication severity, prolonged LOS remained significantly associated with reduced OS and DFS. Major postoperative complications, particularly anastomotic fistula and pulmonary infection, were also associated with poorer long-term outcomes. Prolonged LOS after esophagectomy is associated with adverse long-term survival outcomes and may serve as a clinically informative prognostic indicator reflecting perioperative vulnerability and delayed recovery. LOS should be interpreted as a surrogate marker of postoperative recovery, rather than a causal determinant of survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in esophageal cancer (n=84). Prolonged postoperative length of stay (≥17 days) after esophagectomy was associated with a 5-year overall survival rate of 30.4%, compared to 43.9% in the normal LOS group.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: