Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines how varying sample volume affects lung transfer factor in individuals with different lung functions, indicating potential clinical significance.
Background: ATS/ERS 2005 guidelines advise a standardised protocol for measuring Transfer factor for the lung (TL CO ) via a single breath-hold method. The volume of exhaled gas sampled limits the test in subjects with a vital capacity (VC) under 1.0L. A measure of TL CO in this group would be clinically useful. This study aimed to see how reducing sample volume (V samp ) influenced TL CO . Methods: We randomly reviewed 125 (87 males, mean age 49-±8.8 years (± sd)) reproducible TL CO tests from our database. Five subgroups (n=25) were included: 1) healthy 2) restrictive lung function, and 3) mild 4) moderate 5) severe obstructive lung disease. For each patient two real-time gas traces were analysed. Washout volume was maintained, whilst the V samp was varied to give TL CO readings for V samp of 0.2L, 0.4L, 0.6L and 0.8L and 1.0L. The repeatability of TL CO at each V samp was investigated with repeatability coefficient. TL CO at each V samp was compared to the TL CO at 1.0L V samp and the difference illustrated using Bland & Altman plots. Results: Repeatability was not affected by changing V samp in any of the subgroups (repeatability coefficient: 0.42-0.64). Mean TL CO increased as little as 3-5% with increasing V samp, with the largest difference between a 0.2L and 1.0L V samp. However the imprecision of the mean (limits of agreement up to 0.65mmol/min/kPa) indicated a fall in TL CO equal to 15% was possible. Conclusion: In this study changing V samp does not compromise repeatability. A clinically significant variation in TL CO of up to 15% is possible with a reduced V samp . Further study is needed to confirm this observation and investigate the effect of changing V samp on transfer coefficient and alveolar volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herring et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: