Automated coding of tumors in pathology reports was evaluated, indicating challenges for routine clinical use.
Although LLMs demonstrate promising capabilities as support systems for expert-guided pathology coding, their performance is not yet sufficient for fully automated, unsupervised use in routine clinical workflows. LLMs showed poor performance on rare conditions, heavy dependence on contextual information, and substantially lower scores for morphology versus topography classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arzideh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: