Scribal habits reveal textual variance in π127, suggesting further exploration of early New Testament manuscripts.
The scribal habits in π127 confirm James R. Royseβs findings that early New Testament scribes omit more than they add. Although π127 reflects more omissions than additions, the scribeβs habits are nevertheless strikingly different than Royseβs scribes. Royse also wonders if scribal conventions may have changed, becoming more fixed in post-Constantine Christianity. Such a question would require an investigation of many later manuscripts. π127, however, does not represent a fixed, more stable text. Rather, the opposite is true: π127 displays a high degree of textual variance. More studies of this type are needed to determine if π127 is indicative of the fifth century or if other fifth-century witnesses exhibit textual fixity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan Taylor Farnes (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: