Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitatively evaluates strategies for GHG reduction in shipping fleets, indicating cost-effective solutions.
In the shipping sector, the adoption of onboard carbon capture and storage (OCCS) systems and the transition to e-fuels are expected to play key roles in achieving net-zero emissions. However, because these measures have limitations in both greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential and cost, it is essential to design a vessel fleet that integrates these measures to meet emission-reduction targets in a cost-effective manner. This study quantitatively estimates the GHG fuel intensity (GFI) and total annualized expenditure (TAE) of vessels operating with different various marine fuels (MGO, LNG, e-MeOH, and e-NH 3 ) as well as OCCS system, under scenarios that consider both fossil and renewable electricity sources and projected green H 2 cost. The results identify the optimal composition of a fleet that minimizes TAE while meeting the emission-reduction target. In scenarios where the green H 2 cost exceeds 2.5 USD/kg H2 , fossil-fueled vessels with OCCS system dominate the fleet compositions, whereas e-fuel vessels dominate in scenario with a green H 2 cost of 1.45 USD/kg H2 . Across all scenarios, achieving net-zero emissions consistently requires e-MeOH vessels with OCCS system, as only these vessels achieve negative emissions sufficient to offset the positive emissions from the rest of the vessels. • This study presents the most cost-optimal fleet composition meeting emission targets. • When green hydrogen cost exceeds 2.5 $/kg, fossil-fueled vessels with OCCS dominate. • When green hydrogen cost is 1.45 $/kg, e-fueled vessels dominate. • E-MeOH vessels with OCCS are essential as they achieve negative GHG emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: