Evaluation of algae effects on ruminal fermentation and methane mitigation, suggesting fermentation pattern changes.
This study evaluated the effects of four macroalgae (Colaconema spp., Ulva intestinalis, Ceramium spp., Pylaiella litoralis) and two microalgae (Haematococcus pluvialis, Porphyridium purpureum), chosen due to their local cultivability in the southern Baltic Sea region and potential gas-reducing properties reported for their taxa, on rumen fermentation and methane production. Therefore, the in vitro ANKOM Rf gas production system was used; three trials were conducted and gas kinetics, gas composition after 48 h of incubation, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed. For Trial 1.1, the algae biomasses were added at 4% to a conventional dairy diet and incubated in buffered rumen fluid for 48 h, to evaluate their potential as a supplement. In Trial 1.2, the polysaccharide-enriched algae extracts were added at 2% to the base diet using the same procedure, to investigate the role of the polysaccharide content. For Trial 2, the macroalgae biomasses were evaluated solely to assess their fermentation potential. The addition of the red alga Colaconema spp. (Colaconema) altered the SCFA profile with a shift towards propionate (rate of change in propionate concentration, ΔC3 = 1.216; p < 0.001), without compromising total SCFA yield. The same could be assessed for Ulva intestinalis (U. intestinalis), limited to Trial 2 (ΔC3 = 0.516; p < 0.001). The addition of U. intestinalis led to reduced initial gas production (p = 0.003), reaching the maximum gas production rate at 5.8 h of incubation, 0.3–0.7 h later than the others (5.1–5.5 h). While there was no significant methane reduction at the chosen inclusion rates, the results indicate that both algae influence the SCFA profile and therefore fermentation pattern, with U. intestinalis warranting further investigation on gas production dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brunnbauer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: