Structured review shows that AI-human collaboration enhances robustness in volatile financial markets, indicating improved strategies.
This study provides a structured review of statistical arbitrage research in the context of artificial intelligence, with a particular focus on machine learning based methods. The reviewed literature highlights the evolution from linear, rule-based strategies to increasingly complex data-driven models, while also documenting persistent challenges related to tail-risk exposure, regime instability, limited interpretability, and regulatory and governance constraints in practical applications. Building on this literature synthesis, the paper develops a conceptual AI-led, human-in-the-loop statistical arbitrage framework that integrates ML-generated signal modeling with structured human oversight—encompassing risk calibration, discretionary intervention, and interpretability review. This framework resonates with human-AI collaboration systems across other financial domains, collectively supporting the proposition that collaborative systems show potential to enhance resilience compared to purely AI-driven alternatives under specific market stress scenarios. It is positioned as a governance-oriented synthesis that qualitatively extends existing human-in-the-loop concepts by structurally embedding adaptive oversight within the statistical arbitrage decision architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Binxu Lei (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: