Stochastic modelling reveals ship emissions impact air quality in ports, suggesting critical mitigation strategies.
Decarbonizing the maritime sector requires not only adopting alternative fuels and propulsion technologies but also quantitatively assessing their impacts on coastal and urban air quality. This study develops a stochastic, time-resolved air-quality modelling framework to evaluate ship-related pollutant dispersion in port environments. The approach integrates Automatic Identification System (AIS) trajectories, vessel-specific emission factors, and meteorological inputs within a moving-source Gaussian dispersion model to simulate the spatio-temporal evolution of pollutant concentrations. A 24 h case study for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach demonstrates highly intermittent emission behaviour, with peak aggregated emission rates reaching approximately 1.2 kg/s for CO2 and 3.8 g/s for SO2. Temporally integrated concentration fields reveal maximum cumulative dosages of 0.145 g·s/m3 for NOx, 0.023 g·s/m3 for SO2, 0.014 g·s/m3 for total PM, and 7.5 g·s/m3 for CO2 in near-port traffic corridors. Sensitivity analysis indicates that effective emission height variations alter cumulative exposure by up to 17%, whereas temporal resolution changes produce deviations below 7%, confirming numerical stability. Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation demonstrates bounded but non-negligible variability in exposure estimates under realistic emission and wind uncertainties. Results show that cumulative exposure patterns differ substantially from short-term concentration peaks, highlighting the importance of time-integrated and receptor-based metrics for port air quality assessment. The proposed AIS-driven stochastic framework provides a reproducible and computationally efficient tool for evaluating operational mitigation strategies and supporting evidence-based maritime decarbonization pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şener et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: