Comparative study evaluates ChatGPT's glucose strategies for diabetes, suggesting its reliability for simpler cases.
Background The increasing incidence of diabetes poses a significant burden on healthcare systems. Limited research exists on tools to assist providers in developing personalized glucose-lowering strategies, which could alleviate this pressure and enhance patient outcomes. Objective This study aims to evaluate the capability of ChatGPT-4o in developing personalized glucose-lowering strategies for individuals with diabetes. Methods First, an evaluation of ChatGPT-4o’s performance on China’s qualification examination for attending physicians in endocrinology. Second, a cross-sectional study was conducted, involving the comparison of glucose-lowering strategies formulated by ChatGPT-4o, general practitioners (GPs), and attending physicians (APs) in endocrinology for a set of 30 real-world diabetes cases. Three clinical experts scored blindly the reasonableness of each strategy on a scale, with stratification of cases into three complexity levels (A, B, and C) and evaluation of mean scores for each level. Results ChatGPT-4o successfully passed all sections of the qualification examination with scores above the 60% threshold. In developing glucose-lowering strategies, ChatGPT-4o achieved a mean score comparable to GPs (82.24 ± 9.933 vs 79.83 ± 3.768; p = .317) but lower than APs (82.24 ± 9.933 vs 86.35 ± 4.142; p = .0467). Performance declined with increasing case complexity, with mean scores dropping from 89.90 ± 2.936 for simple cases (A-level) to 76.12 ± 11.93 for complex cases (C-level) (p <.0020). Conclusions ChatGPT-4o performs reliably in generating glucose-lowering strategies for simpler diabetes cases, highlighting its potential to assist community health workers. However, its accuracy in complex cases, especially concerning medication contraindications, requires improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: