Key result
Depleting recruited macrophages improves cardiac function after I/R injury while depleting resident macrophages worsens dysfunction.
Why the study?
The study aimed to determine how macrophage origin, tissue location, and cardiac injury type shape macrophage phenotypes over time in ischemic and non-ischemic hearts, linking these dynamics to remodeling and heart failure.
Macrophage origin and tissue environment dictate their role in post-injury cardiac remodeling, with recruited macrophages driving inflammation and resident macrophages promoting tissue repair.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preservation of resident macrophages may improve post-MI remodeling; extends evidence for their protective role versus recruited cells.
Resident macrophages account for 5% of the cells in the healthy heart. In response to cardiac injury, monocytes infiltrate and differentiate into recruited macrophages complementing the original resident macrophage population and their progeny. Overall macrophages shape the post-injury trajectory of the heart, influencing remodelling processes that determine progression to heart failure (HF). We aim to determine how macrophage origin, tissue location, and the type of cardiac injury shape macrophage phenotypes over time in ischemic and non-ischemic hearts, linking these dynamics to maladaptive remodeling and heart failure risk. Using a reporter mouse model, we visualized and quantified the dynamics of the resident and recruited macrophages in ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury and pressure overload after transversal aortic constriction (TAC) models. I/R represents an acute, localized injury, while TAC increases cardiac afterload continuously and affects the heart globally. Initially, recruited macrophages outnumbered the resident macrophage pool within the infarct area but ultimately reached a near 1:1 equilibrium at 4 weeks post I/R injury. In contrast, in the remote myocardium and TAC-injured hearts, this equilibrium was established within the first week and persisted as cardiac function declined. In the infarct, recruited macrophages transcriptomics exhibited elevated cytokine synthesis and inflammatory responses that remained active up to day 28 post-MI. Interestingly, by day 28, both macrophage populations converged onto a shared phenotype. In the remote myocardium, resident macrophages preserved homeostasis, while recruited macrophages retained an inflammatory program. Following TAC, transcriptional profiles of recruited and resident macrophages remained distinct, with recruited macrophages driving immune responses and resident macrophages promoting tissue remodelling. As we observed that the cardiac tissue environment can override macrophage ontogeny, we also demonstrated that both macrophage subsets actively modify their tissue surroundings. Depleting recruited macrophages reduced overall macrophages numbers and improved cardiac function after I/R injury. Conversely, depleting resident macrophages disrupted wound healing, worsening cardiac dysfunction. These findings demonstrate that macrophages directly influence cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and other cardiac cell types, profoundly altering the cardiac microenvironment and contributing to functional outcomes post-injury. In conclusion, ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac injuries trigger a transient surge in monocyte recruitment and macrophage differentiation, with recruited macrophages progressively integrating into the tissue-resident pool at different paces. Modulating the balance between macrophage subsets affects functional recovery, highlighting macrophage plasticity as a potential therapeutic target to mitigate adverse remodeling and HF progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vico et al. (2026) studied this question. Depleting recruited macrophages improved cardiac function after I/R injury, while depleting resident macrophages worsened dysfunction, highlighting their distinct roles.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: