Key result
LA strain and circularity predict recurrent stroke and new-onset AF in ESUS patients.
Why the study?
Do left atrial sphericity and strain parameters predict recurrent stroke and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source?
Cohort (n=459)
Do left atrial sphericity and strain parameters predict recurrent stroke and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source?
p-value: p=<0.05
Left atrial reservoir and conduit strain, along with circularity, serve as independent non-invasive predictors for recurrent stroke and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.
Supports incorporating LA strain and circularity into ESUS risk models; extends atrial cardiomyopathy hypothesis for prevention trials.
AIMS: Recurrent-stroke and new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) are prevalent following Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS). Various left atrial (LA) parameters are altered in ESUS patients vs. those with non-cardioembolic stroke (non-CES); these parameters may help risk-stratify ESUS patients for recurrent-stroke and new-AF. We comprehensively evaluated LA parameters in ESUS patients compared to non-CES patients. We further determined LA parameters associated with recurrent-stroke and new-AF in ESUS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively recruited ischaemic stroke patients (ESUS (n = 203), non-CES (n = 256)). Comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation included LA volume, function (strain) and sphericity (circularity). ESUS patients were followed for recurrent-stroke and new-AF. LA parameters were assessed for association with outcomes. ESUS patients had increased LA volume, reduced reservoir and contractile strain, and increased circularity compared to non-CES patients (P < 0.002 for all). 36(18%) of ESUS patients developed recurrent-stroke, and 54(27%) recurrent-stroke or new-AF. Larger LA volume, reduced phasic LA strain (reservoir, contractile and conduit), and increased circularity (P < 0.05 for all) were associated with both outcomes in ESUS patients. Independent and incremental value was determined for reservoir and conduit strain, and circularity, in identifying patients at risk of recurrent-stroke and new-AF. CONCLUSION: LA reservoir and conduit strain, and circularity have independent and incremental association with the occurrence of recurrent-stroke and new-AF in ESUS patients. This may represent measurable non-invasive markers of atrial cardiomyopathy in a subset of ESUS patients and enable risk-stratification and targeted intervention. Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischaemic stroke (Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) (n=459). Altered left atrial parameters (volume, strain, and circularity) vs. Normal left atrial parameters / non-cardioembolic stroke was evaluated on Recurrent-stroke and new-onset atrial fibrillation (p=<0.05). In patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source, larger left atrial volume, reduced phasic strain, and increased circularity were associated with recurrent stroke and new-onset AF (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: