This pipeline enhances denoising in multi-echo fMRI, suggesting improved data quality for neuroimaging.
Multi-echo fMRI has emerged as a powerful strategy to mitigate head motion-related noise and minimize susceptibility-related signal loss in BOLD data. Multi-echo independent component analysis (ME-ICA) effectively distinguishes between BOLD-related (TE-dependent) signals and non-BOLD (TE-independent) noise, yielding substantial enhancements in performance compared to traditional echo-combination methods. We introduce a novel ICA-based denoising step, preICA, applied to raw multi-echo data before optimal T2*-weighted echo combination. This approach, combined with ME-ICA, yields substantial gains in data denoising. Our results show that preICA significantly enhances the efficacy of optimal echo combination and ME-ICA to reduce noise. To facilitate the reliable processing of multi-echo fMRI data, we integrated preICA and ME-ICA into fMRIPrep, resulting in the creation of a robust multi-echo processing pipeline, called MEPrep, offering flexibility in preprocessing options (with or without preICA and/or ME-ICA) beyond the echo combination approach offered by fMRIPrep. We validated MEPrep on an open resting-state multi-echo fMRI dataset, demonstrating that incorporating the preICA step leads to statistically significant improvements in denoising efficacy, as evidenced by (1) enhanced T2* exponential model fitting accuracy; (2) reduced motion-related BOLD fluctuations; (3) increased temporal signal-to-noise ratio; (4) improved spatial and temporal reliability of functional connectivity; and (5) increased Shannon entropy. MEPrep outperforms existing pipelines by synergistically integrating preICA and ME-ICA, achieving superior noise suppression while preserving the neurobiological complexity of denoised BOLD signals. By automating multi-echo preprocessing within a robust pipeline, MEPrep provides a scalable solution for high-quality multi-echo fMRI data preprocessing. The pipeline is openly available, ensuring reproducibility and accessibility for the neuroimaging community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: