Evaluates predictors of acute genitourinary adverse events in localized prostate cancer treated with proton beam therapy, suggesting pretreatment evaluations are crucial.
Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides sharper dose gradients than conventional photon radiotherapy, potentially reducing radiation exposure to normal tissues. However, acute genitourinary adverse events (GU AEs) remain a clinical concern. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and predictors of grade ≥ 2 acute GU AEs in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with real-time image-gated, spot-scanning PBT (RGPT). We analyzed the prospective study data of 326 patients who received RGPT at a dose of 63 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 21 fractions between 2019 and 2021. Acute GU AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictive factors, including baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), age, comorbidities, hydrogel spacer placement, use of anticoagulants or urinary symptom medications, clinical stage, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification, prostate volume, and dose-volume histogram parameters. Grade 2 acute GU AEs occurred in 127 patients (39.0%), whereas no grade ≥ 3 events were observed. Moderate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.82) and severe (OR = 3.75; 95% CI: 1.49-9.46) baseline IPSS, as well as age ≥ 75 years (OR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.95), were significant independent predictors of grade ≥ 2 GU AEs. No dose-volume histogram parameters were significantly associated with grade ≥ 2 GU AEs. Baseline urinary symptoms and older age were independent predictors of grade ≥ 2 GU AEs, emphasizing the importance of pretreatment evaluation in optimizing patient selection and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: