Field trial evaluates foliar nano-nitrogen effects on rice yield in different soil types, highlighting the need for targeted strategies.
Nanoenabled nitrogen (N) fertilizers are being explored to improve nitrogen use efficiency and reduce conventional N inputs in rice production. Their nanoscale size enables a steady nitrate supply during critical reproductive stages, supporting sustained N assimilation via nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase rather than short‐term N surges typical of bulk urea. Most studies to date remain confined to a single soil type. This first field trial in Indonesia showed that nano‐N performance and the optimal application rate vary across soil types while maintaining rice yield and N uptake. The study aimed to evaluate the agronomic effectiveness of nano‐N applied in combination with urea doses in two contrasting paddy soil types, Vertic Epiaquepts and Typic Epiaquepts, arranged in a randomized complete block design. Treatments consisted of urea applied at 100%, 75%, and 50% of the recommended rate (225 kg ha −1 ), combined with nano‐N doses of 0–4 mL L −1 . The results showed that rice chlorophyll responses to foliar nano‐N were driven mainly by soil type rather than fertilizer form. Higher chlorophyll contents in Vertic Epiaquepts reflected greater N availability compared with Typic Epiaquepts. Rice growth and yield were controlled by N availability rather than nano‐N rate. Supplementation with 1 mL L −1 nano‐N maintained yield (6.18–6.54 t ha −1 ) while reducing urea inputs by 25%–50%, particularly in Vertic Epiaquepts. Rice yield showed a quadratic relationship with leaf chlorophyll content, indicating that nano‐N improved the effectiveness of fertilizer N applied while maintaining comparable yield. The effectiveness of nano‐N was strongly soil‐dependent. Nano‐N improved relative agronomic effectiveness (113%–124%), maintained yield and N uptake in Vertic Epiaquepts, even with 25%–50% reduced urea rates, but provided little benefit in Typic Epiaquepts. These results highlight the need for soil‐specific nano‐N strategies to maintain rice productivity and enhance the agronomic efficiency of N.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: