Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A randomized controlled trial compares intraneural facilitation and standard physical therapy to prevent neuropathy in women with cancer, suggesting both methods are effective.
This study compared Intraneural Facilitation (INF®) therapy and standard physical therapy (PT) in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in women with newly diagnosed breast and gynecologic cancer. Thirty-eight women undergoing platinum and/or taxane-based chemotherapy, without prior peripheral neuropathy, were randomized into INF® therapy (n = 20) and PT (n = 18). Treatments lasted 45 minutes, twice weekly, for 6 weeks. Neuropathy severity was evaluated using the Pain Quality Assessment Scale. Assessments were at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-intervention. Acceptability, burden, and satisfaction were evaluated after 6 weeks. Among 38 patients, 12 (32%) experienced CIPN, with mean pain scores remaining mild (≤3) and no pharmacotherapy required until week 6. No adverse events were reported from the interventions. The INF® therapy arm showed significant changes in numbness (F = 6.030, P = .001, partial η² = 0.262) after week 6, while the PT arm showed significant changes in numbness (Z = -2.39, P = .017), tingling (Z = -2.84, P = .004), cramping (Z = -2.120, P = .034), surface pain (Z = -2.75, P = .006), and deep pain (Z = -1.99, P = .046) between weeks 3 and 6. Nearly 80% of patients completed chemotherapy cycles with an average relative dose intensity of 90.4% (INF® therapy: 87.73% vs PT: 73.44%). Ninety-four percent of patients were satisfied with their care, accepted the treatments, and perceived them as a low burden. The results demonstrated that INF® therapy and PT are feasible options for CIPN, improving treatment adherence, outcomes, and quality of life for women with newly diagnosed breast and gynecological cancers.Trial Registration - The study was pre-registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03272919). August 8, 2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hankins et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: