Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved instruction-giving in pre-service teachers, suggesting effective training in CLIL settings.
Instruction-giving (IG) is central to classroom interaction in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), yet it is rarely taught explicitly in pre-service CLIL teacher education. In response, the authors redesigned a CLIL practicum course and introduced targeted IG training in the second year. This study (a) described the redesign of an IG-focused training component and (b) examined whether the redesigned course was associated with differences in student teachers’ IG practices across cohorts. Fifty-two pre-service teachers in an eight-semester Primary English Language Teaching program (PELT) in Germany implemented CLIL-based projects with 180 pupils (ages 9–10) across two consecutive cohorts (2024, n = 25; 2025, n = 27). The study compared a baseline course implementation (2024) with a redesigned implementation that included explicit IG training (2025) informed by previous research. Audio-recorded classroom discourse from a randomly selected subsample of STs (n = 20; 10 per cohort) was segmented into CLIL-related IG episodes and analyzed using eight IG principles rated on a four-point scale. Quantitative comparisons were complemented by qualitative classroom discourse analysis and field notes. Mean overall IG scores were higher in 2025 (M = 3.16) than in 2024 (M = 2.79). The largest differences concerned clarity, responding to non-understanding, and strategic L1 use. Differences were smaller for sequencing and multimodality, and modeling did not differ across cohorts in this dataset. The findings suggest that explicit IG training is a teachable component of pre-service teachers’ instructional repertoire. While the cross-cohort design does not support causal claims, consistent descriptive and qualitative differences suggest that explicit IG training holds pedagogical promise for CLIL teacher education. • Instruction-giving (IG) is a teachable component of student teachers' (STs ) instructional repertoire. • Explicit IG training improved STs' clarity, sequencing, multimodality, and strategic L1 use in CLIL classrooms. • Cohort comparison revealed medium-to-large practical gains for the explicitly trained group. • High-quality IG was characterized by micro-sequencing, modeling, and multimodal scaffolding. • Findings underscore the value of embedding explicit IG practice in pre-service CLIL teacher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: