Demonstrates a machine learning approach that identifies unique volatile biomarkers for New Zealand monofloral honeys, suggesting a robust method for authenticity verification.
Authenticating monofloral honeys is essential for protecting premium markets and ensuring traceability. This study applied an integrated analytical and explainable machine-learning workflow to identify volatile biomarkers for four New Zealand monofloral honeys: thyme, mānuka, kānuka, and clover. Twenty-two samples were profiled using headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC–MS), yielding 122 tentative volatiles across aldehydes, alcohols, acids, esters, terpenoids, and phenolics. Data were analysed using ANOVA, hierarchical clustering, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), and Random Forest classification with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). ANOVA and heatmap analysis revealed honey-specific volatile modules, while PLS-DA confirmed clear supervised separation of floral types. A rule-based SHAP framework was implemented to select biomarkers that were not only influential in the model but also directionally consistent and chemically distinctive. Thyme honey was characterised by short-chain fatty acids and oxygenated terpenoids; mānuka by methoxyacetophenones and benzofuran/methoxylated benzoates; kānuka by anisole-type aromatics and bicyclic monoterpenes; and clover by phenylpropanoid-related aldehydes, fusel alcohols, and linalool-oxide derivatives. These panels achieved non-overlapping group separation and near-perfect cross-validated performance (micro-average ROC-AUC = 0.995). This combined HS-SPME/GC–MS and RF-SHAP approach provides a transparent, statistically supported route to defining interpretable volatile biomarkers, offering a scalable framework for honey authentication, quality assurance, and traceability, and helping safeguard the premium positioning of New Zealand monofloral honeys in global markets. • HS-SPME/GC–MS used to profile volatiles in New Zealand monofloral honeys. • Integrated workflow combines ANOVA, clustered heat maps, PLS-DA, Random Forest and SHAP. • 122 volatiles grouped into honey-specific modules with clear, non-overlapping class separation. • Class-specific SHAP criteria define robust, directionally consistent volatile biomarker panels. • Approach supports honey authentication and quality assurance, quality control and traceability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lakshitha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: