Honey authenticity is compromised by mislabelled origin, blending, and product modification, undermining traceability and consumer trust. To address this, we developed a phenolic-focused, untargeted ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–ion mobility–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC–IM–QTOF-MS) workflow for profiling Scottish honeys using a low-solvent extraction approach and collision cross section-supported annotation (CCS-SA). Thirty-nine samples, including Scottish heather, spring, and summer honeys together with market-relevant comparators, were analysed to investigate compositional variation linked to origin, season, and product type. The workflow produced a robust, quality-controlled feature set with strong dilution linearity, while integration of accurate mass, retention time, MS/MS, and CCS increased confidence in marker annotation. Paired within-apiary comparison provided robust evidence that spring and summer honeys carry distinct season-associated chemical signatures, and heather honey emerged as a chemically distinct class. Exploratory analyses also indicated differences between Scottish and non-Scottish honeys and compositional shifts associated with blending and infusion. Because several comparator groups were small and unbalanced, these findings are considered preliminary. Overall, the workflow provides a robust platform for characterising seasonal variation and discovering candidate authenticity markers in Scottish honey.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duft et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: