Comparative analysis measures lens parameters in different progressive lenses, indicating notable differences in patient acceptance.
Different types of progressive addition lenses were compared with each other. It was our aim to measure all parameters in such a way that they were consistent with the normal wearing situation. The distribution of the spherical power and astigmatism was measured with a special focimeter. The induced distortion, which is important for patient acceptance, was determined by a photographic method. There are significant differences between the various types of progressive addition lenses. However, objective information is not sufficient to resolve the subjective question of patient acceptance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DIEPES et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: