This driving simulator study identifies driver behavioral strategies during speed cushion traversal, indicating how interventions affect driving habits.
Traffic calming measures are widely used to reduce operating speeds and mitigate crash risk in urban corridors; however, the way drivers adapt their control strategy when traversing Berlin speed cushions is still poorly described from a multivariate behavioral perspective. This study proposes a behavior-oriented analysis to identify recurring speed-cushion traversal strategies using driving simulator telemetry. A fixed-base simulator reproduced a real urban corridor, and trajectories were segmented in device-centered spatial windows capturing approach, traversal, and immediate recovery. Each segment was summarized by three indicators describing longitudinal and lateral control: mean speed, peak braking demand, and average lane position deviation. Features were standardized and clustered using k-means. The number of clusters was selected primarily through mean silhouette evaluation, while resampling-based checks and a Gaussian mixture modeling comparison were used as supportive evidence rather than competing decision rules. Three traversal profiles emerged: smooth cautious, reactive cautious, and unmoderated fast. The introduction of speed cushions shifted the distribution of segments towards cautious profiles, while driver-level concentration within a single profile was moderate. Overall, results indicate that speed cushions influence the whole vehicle control strategy, offering a quantitative basis for behavior-oriented evaluation of local traffic calming interventions in smart-city contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bosurgi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: