Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares the accuracy of NCT and Mackay‐Marg tonometry in assessing IOP, suggesting reliable measurements.
The Mackay‐Marg electronic tonometer is generally regarded as an applanation tonometer of high clinical accuracy and has been used for obtaining correlations with other tonometers on a number of occasions. Concerning the correlation between the Mackay‐Marg tonometer and the recently introduced Non‐Contact‐Tonometer (NCT) no results have yet been published. In this study 58 patients had their eyes measured by both NCT and Mackay‐Marg tonometry. All the measurements were performed without the use of anesthesia. A close relationship between the readings from the two tonometers was found. Pearson's coefficient of correlation is +0.87, which suggests that the NCT is accurately assessing the same function as the Mackay‐Marg tonometer, i.e. the IOP. The mean of the Mackay‐Marg readings was 18.48 and the standard deviation 3.52, and that of the NCT was 17.38 and the S.D. 3.84. The criteria for reference seem to be similar in NCT and Mackay‐Marg Tonometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bengt Burman (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: