PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Urogynecology

Cost-Effectiveness of Sacrohysteropexy Versus Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LGLauren GriswoldKDKatherine L. DenglerEWEva K. Welch

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This model compares the cost-effectiveness of sacrohysteropexy and hysterectomy with implications for healthcare decisions.

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sacrocolpopexy with supracervical hysterectomy compared to sacrohysteropexy.
  • Developed a decision tree model using TreeAge® software.
  • Expressed effectiveness in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
  • Estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between treatments.
  • Conducted probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and created cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.
  • SCH-SCP had an ICER of $59,820 per QALY compared to MISH.
  • MISH was linked to 648 additional major surgical procedures and 5 endometrial cancer cases for a cohort of 10,000.
  • SCH-SCP had a 55.4% probability of being cost-effective at a WTP of $100,000.

Cite This Study

Griswold et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be35f96e48c4981c6747fbhttps://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001842
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cost Analysis of Supracervical Versus Total Hysterectomy During Sacrocolpopexy2026
  2. 2Mesh Exposure After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Concomitant Total Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation: A Retrospective Cohort Study2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Cost Effectiveness of Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension During Hysterectomy2026
  4. 4Hysterectomy with Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Native Tissue Repair for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026
  5. 5Comparative Analysis of Operative Times in Robotic versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: An ACS-NSQIP study2026