Key result
MI patients report higher life satisfaction than CCS patients, though smoking and comorbidities predict poorer QoL.
Why the study?
Although modern therapies have improved survival in CAD, quality of life remains an important clinical concern.
Observational (n=220)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 24% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.003
Quality of life in CAD patients undergoing PCI is more strongly influenced by lifestyle factors like smoking and comorbidities than by the specific CAD phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prioritize lifestyle modification including smoking cessation in CAD patients post-PCI; reinforces these factors as more influential on QoL than CAD phenotype.
Background: Although survival in coronary artery disease (CAD) has improved with modern therapies, quality of life (QoL) remains an important clinical concern. Our study aimed to evaluate QoL, life satisfaction, and disease acceptance in CAD patients and to identify their clinical and lifestyle determinants. Methods: This single-center, prospective study included patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction (MI) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). QoL was assessed using validated questionnaires (WHOQOL-BREF, SWLS, AIS). Comparative analyses between the MI and CCS groups were performed, and the determinants of the outcomes were evaluated using regression models. Results: The study included 220 patients (110 MI and 110 CCS) with a median age of 64 years (IQR 54–70); 30% were women. The WHOQOL-BREF-assessed QoL was comparable between MI and CCS patients, whereas MI patients reported higher life satisfaction (SWLS 24 vs. 20, p = 0.003). Smoking was the strongest determinant of poorer QoL, associated with lower SWLS (β = −2.75; p < 0.001) and WHOQOL-BREF (β = −4.46; p = 0.014). Alcohol consumption (β = −6.22; p = 0.008), hypertension (β = −7.10; p < 0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (β = −9.84; p < 0.001) were also independently associated with lower WHOQOL-BREF scores. Subgroup analyses showed heterogeneity between MI and CCS patients. Conclusions: QoL in CAD patients might be influenced more by lifestyle factors and multimorbidity than by CAD phenotype. Smoking, alcohol, and cardiopulmonary comorbidities might have the most consistent adverse associations with QoL. These findings highlight the potential importance of integrating lifestyle and comorbidity management to improve QoL and patient-reported outcomes in CAD care.
Tokarewicz et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (myocardial infarction or chronic coronary syndrome) (n=220). Myocardial infarction vs. Chronic coronary syndrome was evaluated on Life satisfaction (SWLS score) (p=0.003). Myocardial infarction patients reported higher life satisfaction than chronic coronary syndrome patients (SWLS 24 vs. 20, p=0.003), while smoking and comorbidities strongly predicted poorer quality of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: