Key result
Killip class IV linked to ~61-fold greater odds of in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients.
Why the study?
The prognostic performance of the Killip classification in contemporary STEMI populations treated with primary PCI remains debated.
Does Killip class IV predict in-hospital mortality in adults with STEMI?
Cohort (n=288)
No
Does Killip class IV predict in-hospital mortality in adults with STEMI?
Killip class IV remains a strong, independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in contemporary STEMI patients, supporting its continued use for rapid risk assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports rapid Killip IV risk assessment in STEMI; reinforces its independent prognostic role in contemporary cohorts.
Background and Aims The Killip classification is a long-established bedside tool for early haemodynamic risk stratification in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, its prognostic performance in contemporary STEMI populations treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains debated. We aimed to re-evaluate the association between Killip class and in-hospital mortality in a modern STEMI cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 288 consecutive adults admitted with confirmed STEMI to the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas Clinics, between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. STEMI was diagnosed according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction and ESC guidelines. The primary endpoint was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Independent predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Model discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Overall, in-hospital mortality was 18.2% (52/286 evaluable patients). Mortality increased substantially across Killip classes, from 1.0% in class I and 3.0% in class II to 69.6% in class IV (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, Killip class IV remained an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 60.94, 95% CI 15.98–232.46; p < 0.001), together with age, body mass index, troponin level, and asystole. The final model demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.969, 95% CI 0.945–0.992). Conclusions In this temporary STEMI cohort, Killip class IV was strongly and independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Although lower Killip classes showed limited prognostic separation, the Killip classification remains a rapid and clinically accessible tool for early risk assessment, particularly in haemodynamically unstable patients.
Špečkauskienė et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=288). Killip classification (Class IV) vs. Lower Killip classes (Class I-III) was evaluated on In-hospital all-cause mortality (OR 60.94, 95% CI 15.98-232.46, p=< 0.001). Killip class IV was strongly and independently associated with in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients (OR 60.94; 95% CI 15.98-232.46; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: