Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Robust methodology improves real-time monitoring of aeroelastic systems, suggesting reduced uncertainty in flight tests.
Accurate real-time identification of modal parameters of aeroelastic systems, such as aircraft during flight vibration testing (FVT), remains a major challenge, e.g., due to low signal-to-noise ratios, variations in aerodynamic excitation, and the time-varying nature of flight conditions. This paper presents a robust methodology for online monitoring of aeroelastic systems using output-only modal analysis and data fusion techniques. A clustering-based Automated Modal Analysis framework enables the combination of time-domain (Stochastic Subspace Identification) and frequency-domain (Least-Squares Complex Frequency) methods, providing real-time uncertainty estimates for each identified mode. These results are fused across methods and over time using a Kalman filter, allowing for improved mode tracking and significant reduction of uncertainty. The proposed approach is validated using simulated data, wind tunnel experiments, and flight test data from a modified business jet. Results from wind tunnel testing demonstrate a reduction of the identification errors by up to 63% for eigenfrequency and 33% for the damping ratio. In addition, the results from the flight test demonstrate that the fusion of multiple identification methods with real-time uncertainty assessment and Kalman filtering enhances the robustness and resolution of aeroelastic parameter tracking — enabling more reliable real-time monitoring even under challenging operational conditions. • Real-time modal parameter monitoring for flight vibration tests. • Fusion of time-domain and frequency-domain identification methods. • Fusion of subsequently identified modal parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Volkmar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: