Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review evaluates UAV technologies for managing blue-green infrastructure, highlighting gaps in maturity and suggesting improvements.
Urban blue–green infrastructure (BGI), comprising vegetation and aquatic elements, is fundamental to city resilience and climate adaptation. Effective BGI management necessitates high-resolution, spatially accurate data for which Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have emerged as versatile monitoring tools. This study provides a critical synthesis and analytical evaluation of UAV-based technologies for BGI management from 2018 to 2025. Following a PRISMA-guided methodology, the review evaluates dominant research themes, sensor technologies (RGB, multispectral, thermal, LiDAR, and water and air quality sensors), and analytical methods. Departing from traditional descriptive reviews, this study appraises the operational maturity of these technologies using an adapted Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework. The analysis identifies a significant “maturity gap” between standardized structural mapping (TRL 9) and experimental functional assessments of environmental conditions (TRL 4–6). Notably, the article includes a detailed analysis of specific UAV platforms and sensors, providing specifications of technological capabilities. By identifying critical technical, regulatory, and economic bottlenecks, this review provides a robust, evidence-based foundation for the deployment of drones in enhancing urban resilience and sustainable environmental governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jakubiak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: