Key result
Lp(a) testing is linked to increased lipid-lowering therapy intensification and better LDL-C goal attainment.
Why the study?
The association between lipoprotein(a) testing and lipid-lowering therapy intensification across large health systems was not well characterized.
Does concurrent Lipoprotein(a) testing improve lipid-lowering therapy intensification and LDL-C goal attainment in veterans undergoing lipid testing?
Cohort (n=20,768)
Yes
Does concurrent Lipoprotein(a) testing improve lipid-lowering therapy intensification and LDL-C goal attainment in veterans undergoing lipid testing?
Lipoprotein(a) testing is associated with increased rates of lipid-lowering therapy intensification and improved LDL-C goal attainment in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lp(a) testing may support intensification in VA patients; leaves open causality and generalizability without randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) can refine atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment and guide lipid-lowering therapy intensification (LLTI). However, the association between Lp(a) testing and LLTI across large health systems is not well characterized. METHODS: Using Veterans Affairs electronic health record data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of veterans undergoing lipid testing from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2024. We first compared a 1:1 propensity-matched cohort with concurrent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a) testing with those with LDL-C testing alone. We then compared veterans with elevated versus nonelevated Lp(a) (>50 versus <50 mg/dL). The primary outcome was LLTI within 12 months, defined as therapy initiation, dose escalation, or addition of another lipid-lowering agent. LDL-C goal attainment (<100 mg/dL primary prevention; <70 mg/dL secondary prevention) was assessed within 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: Among 6 941 840 veterans with LDL-C testing, 10 384 (0.1%) underwent Lp(a) testing. The propensity-matched cohort included 20 768 veterans (mean±SD age, 58.4±15.3 years; 12.4% women; 19.2% Black individuals). Elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) was present in 25% (n=2562). Lp(a) testing was associated with greater LLTI (odds ratio [OR], 2.11 [95% CI, 1.95-2.29]), LDL-C testing (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.19-1.36]), and LDL-C goal attainment (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.12-1.33]). Compared with Lp(a) <50 mg/dL, Lp(a) >50 mg/dL was associated with increased LLTI (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.55-1.94]). Lp(a) >100 mg/dL was associated with lower LDL-C goal attainment (OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.56-0.84]). CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) testing was associated with increased LLTI and LDL-C goal attainment. Elevated Lp(a) identified individuals more likely to undergo LLTI, suggesting testing may motivate preventive treatment optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parsa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Veterans undergoing lipid testing (n=20,768). Lipoprotein(a) testing vs. LDL-C testing alone was evaluated on Lipid-lowering therapy intensification (LLTI) within 12 months (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.95-2.29). Lipoprotein(a) testing was associated with greater lipid-lowering therapy intensification within 12 months compared to LDL-C testing alone (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.95-2.29).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: