Qualitative study examines the role of core values in enhancing leadership effectiveness, suggesting a shift in organizational focus.
HRMARS - Purpose: The objectives of this study are twofold: Firstly, to synthesize existing literature on leadership and identify the common foundational elements shared across major leadership theories. Secondly, to conceptually examine the relationship between value-based leadership and leadership effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts a qualitative research design grounded in an extensive systematic literature review to examine the nature of value-based leadership and its influence on leadership effectiveness. Findings: The review reveals that major leadership theories while diverse in orientation converge on a fundamental premise that effective leadership is consistently anchored in core values that guide leaders’ attitudes, behaviours, and decision-making. This indicates that values are not peripheral attributes but central determinants of leadership effectiveness Practical implications: This study emphasizes that leadership effectiveness must be grounded in values, urging organizations to prioritize values assessment in selection, promotion, and succession planning. Practical strategies include values-based training, reflective coaching, ethics simulations, and 360-degree feedback to cultivate ethical, self-aware, and value-based leaders. Originality/value: The novelty of this study lies in its positioning of value-based leadership not just as another leadership style, but also as the essential core of effective leadership itself. While past research has examined value-based leadership separately without linking it to other leadership styles such as ethical, authentic, servant, or transformational leadership, this paper advances a unifying argument by considering values are not an optional dimension of leadership, but the defining quality that all effective leaders must embody.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wahab et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: