Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues against the ideology of quality in education, highlighting its role in depoliticizing the system and promoting inequality.
This article argues that quality , and in particular the idea of continuous improvement , while presented as a neutral and commonsense policy concept, serves to depoliticise education and functions ideologically. Another key element of quality discourse, also framed as self-evident, is the claim that teachers are the most important determinants of educational outcomes. Not only are these notions incorrect; they also act to decontest ‘choice’ and ‘diversity’, thereby enabling inegalitarian forms of measurement and evaluation to dominate and distort the educational process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Abbott (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: