Key result
Female patients with moderate-to-severe VHD show no difference in 2-year survival compared to males.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the distribution, aetiology, treatment patterns, and 2-year outcomes of moderate to severe valvular heart disease between men and women in China.
Are there gender differences in clinical profiles and outcomes, and does valve intervention improve survival compared to conservative therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe valvular heart disease?
Cohort (n=13,917)
Yes
Are there gender differences in clinical profiles and outcomes, and does valve intervention improve survival compared to conservative therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe valvular heart disease?
Effect estimate: HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.80-1.02)
Absolute Event Rate: 91.38% vs 90.41%
p-value: p=0.086
Promotes gender-neutral valve intervention referral in VHD; reinforces outcome parity but leaves open sex-specific profile differences.
Objective To compare the distribution, aetiology, treatment patterns and 2-year outcomes of moderate to severe valvular heart disease (VHD) between men and women in China. Design Nationwide, prospective, multicentre cohort study. Setting 46 tertiary hospitals across China, representing a mix of primary and secondary care settings. Participants A total of 13 917 adult patients with moderate-to-severe VHD were enrolled between April and June 2018. Of these, 6296 (45.24%) were women. Inclusion criteria included moderate or severe native valve disease, infective endocarditis or prior valve intervention. Interventions Patients received either conservative therapy or valve interventions, including surgical repair/replacement or transcatheter procedures. Intervention decisions were based on clinical assessment. Main outcome measures 2-year all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalisation and major adverse cardiovascular events. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify outcome predictors. Results The overall intervention rate was 31.72%, with no gender difference (men: 31.26% vs women: 32.27%). Among the 5427 patients with severe symptomatic VHD, 49.11% received interventional therapy. The sex-specific pattern was particularly significant in severe symptomatic multiple valvular heart disease, where women had a higher propensity for intervention (p<0.001, OR: 1.19–1.66). In severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation patients, women were less likely to receive valve replacement (p=0.03, OR: 0.39–0.95). The 2-year survival rate was 90.85% with no gender difference (men: 90.41% vs women: 91.38%, p=0.086). Valve intervention improved survival to 97.0%, with no gender disparity (men: 96.92% vs women: 97.01%, p=0.87). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed no significant gender effect (p>0.05). Conclusions Significant gender differences exist in VHD aetiology and subtypes in China. Women had more rheumatic VHD, while men had more degenerative and functional VHD. Intervention improved survival, with no gender disparity. Age and VHD subtype influenced intervention rates and prognosis, supporting individualised, sex- and age-stratified management strategies. Trial registration number NCT03484806 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Moderate to severe valvular heart disease (n=13,917). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on 2-year survival rate (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.02, p=0.086). Female patients with moderate-to-severe valvular heart disease showed no significant difference in 2-year survival compared to male patients (91.38% vs 90.41%, p=0.086).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: