Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work demonstrates improved design outcomes of power devices through a novel dynamic simulation framework.
Traditional design and optimisation of Si-based power devices rely on quasi-static edge termination modelling that has proven to be effective in reproducing experimental results. However, this approach fails to accurately describe emerging wideand ultra-wide-bandgap power devices operating in fast-switching environments, such as in automotive applications, where devices are subject to rapid voltage and over-current transients (dV/dt > 100 V/ns). The absence of a robust design methodology that captures the transient electro-thermal response of the semiconductor, oxide, and passivation layers often results in devices that underperform in real operating conditions. This work addresses this longstanding challenge by introducing a comprehensive dynamic simulation framework that reproduces key aspects of dynamic reverse-bias (DRB) testing used for automotive qualification. Using a diamond-based Schottky barrier diode as a case study, we demonstrate that conventional quasi-static and time-dependent simulation strategies lead to markedly different design outcomes. The proposed transient approach captures the interplay between field redistribution, charge trapping, and self-heating effects, offering enhanced predictive accuracy and robustness for the next generation of power devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: