Randomized trial compares GvHD prophylaxis strategies in leukemia patients, indicating similar efficacy and outcomes.
The optimal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis strategy in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) remains controversial. In this open-label, phase Ⅲ study, patients aged 14-70 years with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts Ⅰ or Ⅱ were randomized (2:1:1) to receive low-dose ATG (5 mg/kg)/PTCy (50 mg/kg), standard-dose ATG (total dose 10 mg/kg), or a PTCy (total dose 100 mg/kg)-based regimen for GvHD prophylaxis. The co-primary endpoints were the cumulative incidence (CI) of grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute GvHD (aGvHD) by day 100 and GvHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1 year post-transplant. A total of 407 patients were randomized to receive ATG/PTCy (185 patients), ATG (113 patients), or PTCy (109 patients) regimen for GvHD prophylaxis. By day +100, the CI of grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGvHD did not differ significantly among the three groups (P=0.210). Although the overall incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was comparable across all groups (P=0.110), the 2-year CI of moderate-to-severe cGvHD was numerically lower in the ATG/PTCy (17.4%) and ATG (17.3%) groups compared to the PTCy group (28.3%), without reaching statistical significance (P=0.095). No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes among the three groups. Notably, the cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet recovery was significantly higher in the ATG/PTCy group compared to the other groups (P<0.001). This trial suggested that the three GvHD prophylaxis strategies presented similar efficacy in preventing grade II-IV aGvHD and yielded comparable survival. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03608059.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: