In vivo investigation shows lipoteichoic acid improves colitis and modulates immune responses in mice, suggesting therapeutic potential.
Bifidobacterium bifidum is recognized for its immunomodulatory potential, yet the specific components mediating its anti-inflammatory effects remain poorly defined. Here, we systematically dissected the role of B. bifidum-derived lipoteichoic acid (LTA) in modulating mucosal immunity and alleviating 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced acute colitis. Initial in vitro assays revealed that the IL-10-inducing activity of B. bifidum in mesenteric lymph node cells resides mainly in heat-resistant cell wall fractions, particularly LTA, acting through a TLR2-associated (and pharmacologically TLR2-sensitive) pathway. Comparative analyses among multiple B. bifidum strains demonstrated that LTA immunostimulatory potency strongly predicted protective efficacy against colitis, with FJSWX19M5 strain LTA exerting the most pronounced anti-inflammatory effects in both conventional and germ-free mouse models. In vivo, mice received LTA by oral gavage (0.2 mg/mouse, 200 μL) prior to TNBS challenge. LTA from FJSWX19M5 significantly improved survival, ameliorated colonic injury and inflammation, reduced IL-1β production, and modulated Treg cell distribution, outperforming other strain LTAs. Transcriptomic profiling showed that FJSWX19M5 LTA intervention prominently altered colonic gene expression, activating multiple immune- and inflammation-related signaling pathways, such as Jak-STAT, PI3K-Akt, and IL-17. Furthermore, FJSWX19M5 LTA enhanced both T and B lymphocyte proliferation and cellular immunity in healthy mice. Together, these results establish that the anti-colitis and immunoregulatory benefits of B. bifidum are largely attributable to strain-specific LTA, highlighting its mechanistic link to TLR2-involved mucosal immune modulation and supporting its potential as a defined immunomodulatory molecule for IBD-relevant intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: