PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026Journal of Educational Computing Research3 citations

Effects of Generative AI-Empowered Collaborative Robot Project-Based Learning on Students’ Learning Achievements and Higher Order Thinking Tendencies in Professional Training

View Full Paper
GHGwo-Jen HwangHLHuan‐Fang LeeCCChia‐Hsuin Chang

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the impact of Generative AI-empowered collaborative robot project-based learning on students' learning achievements and higher-order thinking skills.
  • Quasi-experimental design with two groups: experimental (GenAI-CRPT) and control (traditional training)
  • Participants included university students in healthcare education
  • Assessment focused on learning achievement and higher-order thinking skills
  • Students in the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in learning achievement
  • Enhanced critical thinking and problem-solving skills were noted in the experimental group
  • Collaboration and design thinking capabilities improved among students using the GenAI-CRPT approach.

Abstract

Recent advancements in robot project-based training have attracted considerable interest in professional education, particularly in fields such as nursing and healthcare. Fostering students’ higher-order thinking skills, such as critical thinking and decision-making, through educational robotics is essential for achieving the goals of vocational training. However, learners often face challenges in designing and programming effective, interactive robots tailored to healthcare-specific tasks. To address this gap, this study proposed a Generative AI-empowered collaborative robot project-based training (GenAI-CRPT) approach to support healthcare education. A quasi-experimental study was conducted at a university to examine the impact of the GenAI-CRPT approach on students’ learning achievement and higher-order thinking tendencies, including critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, and design thinking. The experimental group ( n = 25) participated in the GenAI-CRPT intervention, while the control group ( n = 25) engaged in a conventional collaborative robot project-based training method. Results revealed that students in the experimental group significantly outperformed those in the control group in all assessed areas, including learning achievement, critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, and design thinking. Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) indicated that the experimental group engaged in more integrated learning processes, where collaboration and reflective practices played pivotal roles in enhancing cognitive engagement and problem-solving performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hwang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf3955c7b3c90b18b43e7fhttps://doi.org/10.1177/07356331261437504
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper