Key result
Mechanical AVV replacement accounts for ~10% of single ventricle surgeries, with outcomes depending on ventricular function.
Why the study?
What are the outcomes and risk factors for mortality after mechanical atrioventricular valve replacement in single-ventricle patients?
Cohort (n=22)
What are the outcomes and risk factors for mortality after mechanical atrioventricular valve replacement in single-ventricle patients?
Mechanical AVV replacement in single-ventricle patients has a high 1-year mortality rate, which is strongly associated with postoperative ventricular impairment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mechanical AVV replacement in single ventricle patients warrants caution without preserved function or successful prior repair; hypothesis-generating for refined selection.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical atrioventricular valve (AVV) replacement in single-ventricle patients carries significant risks with limited outcome data. We evaluated outcomes and identified risk factors for mortality after mechanical AVV replacement during staged Fontan palliation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients who underwent mechanical AVV replacement from 1997 to 2022 after completing at least stage I palliation. Patients were stratified by early postoperative ventricular function (normal vs impaired) and timing of AVV replacement (primary vs post-AVV repair). The primary outcome was transplant-free survival. RESULTS: Median age at valve replacement was 1.7 years (interquartile range, 0.5-8.0 years). Hypoplastic left heart syndrome was the most common diagnosis (n = 10), and the Norwood procedure was the most frequent stage I palliation (n = 13). AVV replacement was performed before or at Fontan completion in 14 patients and after in 8 patients. A previous AVV repair was performed in 11 patients. Intraoperatively, 8 patients converted to AVV replacement after attempted AVV repair. There were 4 in-hospital deaths (18.2%). Transplant-free survival at 1 year was 55.6%. Postoperative reduced ventricular function (hazard ratio, 4.890; P = .018) and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (hazard ratio, 1.013; P = .033) were risk factors for death. Patients with preserved ventricular function showed significantly better survival than those with impaired function (mild, moderate, or severe) (100% vs 25.7% at 1 year, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 10 single-ventricle patients undergoing AVV surgery required mechanical AVV replacement. Outcomes depend on the preserved ventricular function and the results of valve repair before AVV replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsubara et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Single-ventricle patients requiring mechanical atrioventricular valve replacement (n=22). Impaired ventricular function vs. Preserved ventricular function was evaluated on Transplant-free survival (HR 4.890, p=<.001). In single-ventricle patients undergoing mechanical AVV replacement, impaired ventricular function was associated with worse 1-year transplant-free survival compared to preserved function (25.7% vs 100%; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: