Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates antioxidant and anti-diabetic properties of tailored nanocellulose from Momordica charantia, suggesting potential health benefits.
This study reports the synthesis of sulfated cellulose nanocrystals (S-CNC; 23% yield) and carboxymethyl cellulose nanocrystals (CM-CNC; 17% yield) from Momordica charantia fruit biomass via sulfuric acid hydrolysis and TEMPO(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl)-mediated oxidation, respectively. Comprehensive characterization confirmed sulfate (S=O at 1220–1260 cm⁻¹; 0.95 wt% S by EDS) and carboxylate (C=O at 1600–1740 cm⁻¹; C/O 45.62/54.38 wt%) functionalization, alongside preserved cellulose Iβ crystallinity (S-CNC: 92.78%, 6.29 nm crystallites; CM-CNC: 90.37%, 10.65 nm). Both materials exhibited potent antioxidant activity- 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)/(ABTS) (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)/superoxide scavenging: 67–79% at 1000 µg/mL vs. 96–97% ascorbic acid, and anti-inflammatory effects (egg albumin/Bovine Serum Albumin denaturation/Human RBC cells stabilization: 65–78% at 1000 µg/mL vs. 87–90% diclofenac), with S-CNC outperforming CM-CNC. Antidiabetic potential was evident in α-amylase/α-glucosidase inhibition (41–62% at 1000 µg/mL vs. 76–77% acarbose) and enhanced insulin secretion from RIN-5F β-cells (S-CNC: 9.3-fold at 250 µg/mL; CM-CNC: 7.8-fold vs. 11.9-fold glucose control; p < 0.001). Minimal cytotoxicity (>68% viability at 500 µg/mL in RIN-5F cells vs. Streptozotocin control) underscores biocompatibility. These M. charantia -derived nanocelluloses offer promising scaffolds for diabetes management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nidhi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: