Analysis of tricuspid valve surgery impact on survival and outcomes in LVAD patients suggests potential benefits.
OBJECTIVES To assess whether tricuspid valve surgery (TVS) during HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation affects long-term survival and outcomes. METHODS The ELEVATE registry enrolled 540 HM3 patients across 26 centres; 463 undergoing primary LVAD implantation and at least mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR) formed this analysis. Concomitant TVS was performed in 70 (15.1%) patients. Five-year outcomes (survival, functional capacity, end-organ function, adverse events) were compared with those with similar severity of TR not receiving TVS in both overall population (with TVS n = 70 vs without TVS n = 264) and matched groups (each group n = 67, primary analysis cohort). RESULTS In the matched cohort, baseline demographics of patients with or without TVS showed no differences in age (57.9 ± 10.8 vs 57.3 ± 10.0; p = 0.728), sex (male, 92.5% vs 94.0%; p = 1.000), preoperative short-term mechanical circulatory support rate (6.0% vs 9.0% p = 0.744), NYHA class and quality of life (QoL) score and end-organ function. Preoperatively, patients with TVS had shorter six-minute walk distances (6MWD; 58.0 ± 109.0 m vs 105.3 ± 154.0 m; p = 0.081). At 5 years, patients with TVS showed no differences in survival (69.0% vs 59.3%, p = 0.67), 6MWD (311.1 ± 129.5 m vs 295.6 ± 137.7 m, p = 0.758), QoL score, or end-organ function, while presented a lower risk of right heart failure (EPPY 0.038 vs 0.092, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS In the ELEVATE registry, concomitant TVS during HM3 implantation was not associated with differences in five-year survival; however, it may have a positive effect on functional capacity and right heart function. Clinical registration number NCT02497950
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Färber et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: