Review explores therapeutic resistance in CRPC due to AR mutations, suggesting pathways for drug development.
Background: Point mutations to the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD) are becoming increasingly recognized as a mechanism of therapeutic resistance in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The present review explores how point mutations induce molecular changes that contribute to the eventual treatment failure of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in CRPC. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for structural studies on the AR LBD. Eligible articles included molecular docking analysis and emphasized changes in ligand–receptor interactions after point mutation. Structural data were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) using the search parameters “Androgen receptor ligand binding domain”, “Homo sapiens”, and “X-ray diffraction”. PDB files of wild-type and point mutant AR LBDs were accumulated for analysis. Results: A functional shift from inhibiting to activating AR has been documented for multiple ARPIs. Crystallography data and in silico evaluation have deciphered how changes in steric hindrance of the AF-2 domain contribute to ARPI loss of function. To combat therapeutic resistance, discovery efforts have begun to consider combination approaches of orthosteric and allosteric inhibitors, as well as compounds that target other AR domains. Although lead compounds have been identified, none have progressed into the clinic. Conclusions: Questions remain regarding the best approach for rationally designing new AR targeting therapeutics. Understanding how structural changes to the AR LBD lead to the failure of clinical therapeutics is a necessary step that should precede drug discovery campaigns. Moreover, computational modeling is a powerful tool that should be leveraged to streamline therapeutic development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: