Compares anxiety levels and parenting styles in children with cleft lip and palate and controls, suggesting implications for intervention.
ObjectiveTo compare overprotective parenting and child and parent anxiety between children born with and without a cleft lip and/ or palate (CL/P). To understand correlates of anxiety for children born with a CL/P and their parents.Design, Participants, SettingParents of 8- to 12-year-old children with a CL/P (n = 63, mean age = 10.5 years, male = 68.3%), or without a CL/P (control group; n = 66, mean age = 9.9 years, male = 47%) were recruited from the UK community (2022-2024). Most respondents were mothers (92.2%).Outcome measuresParents completed an online survey assessing overprotective parenting, child anxiety, parent anxiety, and (in the CL/P group) parental appraisals.ResultsParent-reported child anxiety was higher in the CL/P group than the control group (ηp² = 0.04, P = .03), while parent anxiety (ηp² = 0.01, P = .26) and overprotective parenting (ηp² = 0.001, P = .73) did not differ significantly between groups. Within the CL/P group, parent-reported child anxiety was associated (P < .05) with parental anxiety (rs = .27), overprotective parenting (rs = .38), and certain parental appraisals (child's self-confidence; rs = .45, and manageability of the CL/P; rs = -.25). Parent anxiety was associated with overprotective parenting (rs = .40), and self-blame appraisals (rs = .37).ConclusionsChildren born with a CL/P may be at increased risk of anxiety by parent-report, while parental anxiety and overprotection appear comparable to controls. Parental appraisals may be promising targets for intervention. Future longitudinal research is required to draw causal inferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Button et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: