Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Different surface height estimation methods are differently affected by interferometric noise. From a theoretical analysis we obtain height variance estimators for the methods. The estimations allow us to rigorously compare the noise robustness of popular evaluation algorithms. The envelope methods have the highest variances and hence the lowest noise resistances. The noise robustness improves from the envelope to the phase methods, but a technique involving the correlation of correlograms is superior even to the latter. We dwell on some details of this correlogram correlation method and the range of its application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiselev et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: